STRATEGIC INTEGRATION OF CHATGPT IN TEACHING VIETNAMESE ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING TO FOREIGN CADETS AT A MILITARY ACADEMY IN VIETNAM

Authors

  • Lam Tran Vietnam Academy of Air Defence and Air Force
  • Nguyễn Phương Nam Học viện Phòng không-Không quân, Việt Nam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2025/1340

Keywords:

Vietnamese as a Foreign Language (VFL), ChatGPT, Argumentative writing, Military cadets, Human–machine collaboration

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic integration of ChatGPT into teaching Vietnamese as a Foreign Language (VFL), focusing on argumentative writing instruction for 24 Lao military cadets at a Vietnamese military university. Over a 15-week action research cycle, ChatGPT was employed at stages such as brainstorming, model analysis, outlining, and editing, while being excluded during initial drafting to preserve student voice. Quantitative results revealed notable gains in argument structure and grammar. Qualitative data from learner journals demonstrated a progression from initial over-reliance to more selective, ethical, and reflective engagement. Teachers were pivotal in prompt design, metacognitive coaching, and fostering responsible AI use. The study concludes that, when scaffolded effectively, ChatGPT can enhance the teaching of VFL argumentative writing by promoting learner autonomy, genre awareness, and revision strategies. However, ethical guidance and pedagogical mediation remain essential to prevent cognitive offloading and maintain authorship integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ang, H. M. (2024). ChatGPT is making its presence felt in classrooms. Here’s how schools in Singapore are harnessing it. CNA. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/chatgpt-schools-singapore-teachers-students-4109836, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

2. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57(2023), Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

4. Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

5. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

6. Meniado, J. C. (2024). Human–machine collaboration in language education in the age of artificial intelligence. RELC Journal, 55(2), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241266629, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

7. Meniado, J. C., Duong, T. T. H., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

8. Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

9. Nguyen, T. N. B. (2017). Mô hình rubric đánh giá năng lực tạo lập văn bản nghị luận xã hội của học sinh trung học phổ thông. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường ĐHSP TP.HCM, 14(10), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.14.10.307(2017), [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

10. Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57(2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752, [ngày truy cập 15/9/2025].

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Tran, L., & Nam. (2025). STRATEGIC INTEGRATION OF CHATGPT IN TEACHING VIETNAMESE ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING TO FOREIGN CADETS AT A MILITARY ACADEMY IN VIETNAM. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2025/1340

Issue

Section

Humanities and Social Sciences

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.