QUANTUM COMPUTING THREATS TO CLASSICAL CRYPTOGRAPHIC MECHANISMS: A SURVEY OF POST‑QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY READINESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2026/1479Abstract
The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a fundamental threat to classical cryptographic mechanisms that underpin modern digital security. Shor’s algorithm can efficiently solve integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems, thereby breaking widely used public-key cryptosystems such as RSA, ECC, and Diffie–Hellman. Grover’s algorithm also reduces the effective security of symmetric encryption and hash functions by half. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the impact of quantum attacks on current cryptographic infrastructures, including TLS, digital signatures, and blockchain. We then review the state of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) as standardized by NIST, focusing on three leading candidates: CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation, and CRYSTALS-Dilithium and FALCON for digital signatures. Through simulation using the Open Quantum Safe (liboqs) library on a standard x86_64 platform, we measure key generation time, encryption/signing speed, decryption/verification latency, and key/signature sizes. Our results show that Kyber-768 achieves key generation in <0.1 ms and produces public keys of about 1.2 KB, while Dilithium-3 generates signatures of ~2.7 KB with verification times under 0.3 ms. Compared to RSA-2048 and ECDSA-P256, PQC algorithms offer competitive performance at the cost of larger key and signature sizes. Based on these findings, we propose a hybrid transition roadmap that combines classical and PQC algorithms in parallel, minimizing risk while maintaining backward compatibility. The paper concludes that organizations should begin immediate preparations for the post-quantum era, especially for data requiring long-term confidentiality.
Downloads
References
[1] IBM, “IBM unveils Condor: 1,121‑qubit quantum processor”, IBM Newsroom, 2023.
[2] P. W. Shor, “Polynomial‑time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer”, SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1484–1509, 1997.
[3] L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search”, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 1996, pp. 212–219.
[4] M. Mosca, “Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: Will we be ready?”, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 38–41, 2018.
[5] G. Alagic, D. Apon, D. Cooper, Q. Dang, T. D. T. Y. K. K. T., et al., “Status report on the third round of the NIST post‑quantum cryptography standardization process”, NIST Internal Report 8413, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022.
[6] D. J. Bernstein and T. Lange, “Post‑quantum cryptography”, Nature, vol. 549, pp. 188–194, 2017.
[7] R. L. de Oliveira, G. L. de Souza, and M. A. S. Netto, “A survey on post‑quantum cryptography for the Internet of Things”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 185, 103082, 2021.
[8] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information”, 10th anniversary ed. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[9] C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, “How to factor 2048‑bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits”, Quantum, vol. 5, p. 433, 2021.
[10] D. Moody, G. Alagic, D. Apon, et al., “Status report on the second round of the NIST post‑quantum cryptography standardization process”, NIST IR 8309, 2020.
[11] The Open Quantum Safe Project, “liboqs: C library for quantum‑safe cryptographic algorithms”, https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs, accessed March 2025.
[12] S. Stebila and M. Mosca, “Post‑quantum key exchange for the Internet and the Open Quantum Safe project”, in Selected Areas in Cryptography – SAC 2016, Springer, 2017, pp. 397–420.
[13] N. Bindel, U. Herath, M. McKague, and D. Stebila, “Transitioning to a quantum‑resistant public key infrastructure”, in International Conference on Post‑Quantum Cryptography, Springer, 2017, pp. 50–68.
[14] Internet Engineering Task Force, “Hybrid key exchange in TLS 1.3”, IETF Internet‑Draft draft‑ietf‑tls‑hybrid‑design‑10, 2024.
[15] E. Barker, W. Barker, W. Burr, W. Polk, and M. Smid, “Recommendation for key management”, NIST Special Publication 800‑57 Part 1 Rev. 5, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in SJTTU are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and SJTTU, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to SJTTU to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to SJTTU, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.