QUANTUM COMPUTING THREATS TO CLASSICAL CRYPTOGRAPHIC MECHANISMS: A SURVEY OF POST‑QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY READINESS

Các tác giả

  • NGUYEN THI THU HUONG
  • NGUYEN VAN THUAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2026/1479

Tóm tắt

The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a fundamental threat to classical cryptographic mechanisms that underpin modern digital security. Shor’s algorithm can efficiently solve integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems, thereby breaking widely used public-key cryptosystems such as RSA, ECC, and Diffie–Hellman. Grover’s algorithm also reduces the effective security of symmetric encryption and hash functions by half. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the impact of quantum attacks on current cryptographic infrastructures, including TLS, digital signatures, and blockchain. We then review the state of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) as standardized by NIST, focusing on three leading candidates: CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation, and CRYSTALS-Dilithium and FALCON for digital signatures. Through simulation using the Open Quantum Safe (liboqs) library on a standard x86_64 platform, we measure key generation time, encryption/signing speed, decryption/verification latency, and key/signature sizes. Our results show that Kyber-768 achieves key generation in <0.1 ms and produces public keys of about 1.2 KB, while Dilithium-3 generates signatures of ~2.7 KB with verification times under 0.3 ms. Compared to RSA-2048 and ECDSA-P256, PQC algorithms offer competitive performance at the cost of larger key and signature sizes. Based on these findings, we propose a hybrid transition roadmap that combines classical and PQC algorithms in parallel, minimizing risk while maintaining backward compatibility. The paper concludes that organizations should begin immediate preparations for the post-quantum era, especially for data requiring long-term confidentiality.  

Tải xuống

Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] IBM, “IBM unveils Condor: 1,121‑qubit quantum processor”, IBM Newsroom, 2023.

[2] P. W. Shor, “Polynomial‑time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer”, SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1484–1509, 1997.

[3] L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search”, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 1996, pp. 212–219.

[4] M. Mosca, “Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: Will we be ready?”, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 38–41, 2018.

[5] G. Alagic, D. Apon, D. Cooper, Q. Dang, T. D. T. Y. K. K. T., et al., “Status report on the third round of the NIST post‑quantum cryptography standardization process”, NIST Internal Report 8413, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022.

[6] D. J. Bernstein and T. Lange, “Post‑quantum cryptography”, Nature, vol. 549, pp. 188–194, 2017.

[7] R. L. de Oliveira, G. L. de Souza, and M. A. S. Netto, “A survey on post‑quantum cryptography for the Internet of Things”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 185, 103082, 2021.

[8] M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information”, 10th anniversary ed. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[9] C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, “How to factor 2048‑bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits”, Quantum, vol. 5, p. 433, 2021.

[10] D. Moody, G. Alagic, D. Apon, et al., “Status report on the second round of the NIST post‑quantum cryptography standardization process”, NIST IR 8309, 2020.

[11] The Open Quantum Safe Project, “liboqs: C library for quantum‑safe cryptographic algorithms”, https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs, accessed March 2025.

[12] S. Stebila and M. Mosca, “Post‑quantum key exchange for the Internet and the Open Quantum Safe project”, in Selected Areas in Cryptography – SAC 2016, Springer, 2017, pp. 397–420.

[13] N. Bindel, U. Herath, M. McKague, and D. Stebila, “Transitioning to a quantum‑resistant public key infrastructure”, in International Conference on Post‑Quantum Cryptography, Springer, 2017, pp. 50–68.

[14] Internet Engineering Task Force, “Hybrid key exchange in TLS 1.3”, IETF Internet‑Draft draft‑ietf‑tls‑hybrid‑design‑10, 2024.

[15] E. Barker, W. Barker, W. Burr, W. Polk, and M. Smid, “Recommendation for key management”, NIST Special Publication 800‑57 Part 1 Rev. 5, 2020.

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

2026-07-06

Cách trích dẫn

NGUYEN THI THU HUONG, & NGUYEN VAN THUAN. (2026). QUANTUM COMPUTING THREATS TO CLASSICAL CRYPTOGRAPHIC MECHANISMS: A SURVEY OF POST‑QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY READINESS. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2026/1479