COFFEE LEAF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION USING THREE LIGHTWEIGHT DEEP LEARNING MODELS: ROBUSTNESS EVALUATION AGAINST IMAGE DEGRADATION AND GRAD-CAM VISUALIZATION

Các tác giả

  • TRAN HUU QUYET

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2026/1478

Tóm tắt

This study evaluates three lightweight deep learning models, namely MobileNetV3-Small, MobileNetV3-Large, and EfficientNet-B0, for coffee leaf disease classification using the Ethiopian Coffee Leaf Disease dataset. The dataset includes four classes: Cerscospora, Healthy, Leaf rust, and Phoma, with 9,180 training images, 1,620 validation images, and 1,200 test images. All models were trained using transfer learning with ImageNet-pretrained weights, and the input images were resized to 224 × 224 pixels. Model performance was first assessed on the original test set and then further evaluated under two image degradation conditions, including blur and low-light. Grad-CAM was applied to the model with the highest overall performance to visualize image regions contributing to its predictions. The experimental results show that MobileNetV3-Large achieved the highest weighted-average F1-score on the original test images, reaching approximately 0.9992. Under degraded image conditions, the same model also obtained the highest weighted-average F1-scores, with 0.9114 under blur and 0.9464 under low-light. EfficientNet-B0 showed comparable performance on the original and low-light images but was more affected by blur. MobileNetV3-Small achieved high performance on the original images but showed a larger performance decrease under low-light conditions. Grad-CAM visualizations indicate that MobileNetV3-Large mainly focused on diseased leaf regions, while several blurred samples showed less distinct activation patterns, corresponding to some misclassification cases. The results indicate that, for lightweight deep learning models in coffee leaf disease classification, evaluation should consider not only classification performance on original images but also robustness under degraded image conditions and model interpretability.

Tải xuống

Dữ liệu tải xuống chưa có sẵn.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] S. P. Mohanty, D. P. Hughes, and M. Salathé, “Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01419.

[2] A. Upadhyay et al., “Deep learning and computer vision in plant disease detection: a comprehensive review of techniques, models, and trends in precision agriculture,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 58, no. 3, p. 92, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-11100-x.

[3] J. G. M. Esgario, R. A. Krohling, and J. A. Ventura, “Deep learning for classification and severity estimation of coffee leaf biotic stress,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 169, p. 105162, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105162.

[4] F. J. P. Montalbo and A. A. Hernandez, “Classifying Barako coffee leaf diseases using deep convolutional models,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 197–209, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.26555/ijain.v6i2.495.

[5] M. Yebasse, B. Shimelis, H. Warku, J. Ko, and A. Et., “Coffee Disease Visualization and Classification,” Plants, 2021, doi: 10.3390/plants10061257.

[6] T. C. Pham, V. D. Nguyen, C. H. Le, M. Packianather, and V.-D. Hoang, “Artificial intelligence-based solutions for coffee leaf disease classification,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1278, no. 1, p. 012004, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1278/1/012004.

[7] A. Howard et al., “Searching for MobileNetV3,” arXiv.org. Accessed: May 21, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02244v5

[8] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks,” arXiv.org. Accessed: May 21, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946v5

[9] J. V. Y. Bordin Yamashita and J. P. R. R. Leite, “Coffee disease classification at the edge using deep learning,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 4, p. 100183, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2023.100183.

[10] D. Hendrycks and T. Dietterich, “Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations,” 2019, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1903.12261.

[11] R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization,” 2016, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1610.02391.

[12] B. Yoseph, “ETHIOPIAN COFFEE LEAF DISEASE,” Kaggle. Accessed: May 21, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/biniyamyoseph/ethiopian-coffee-leaf-disease

[13] N. Mansouri, H. Guessmi, and A. Alkhalil, “A deep learning model for detection and classification of coffee-leaf diseases using the transfer-learning technique,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Inform., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 379–396, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.26555/ijain.v10i3.1573.

[14] A. Topal, B. Tunga, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “DeepEMPR: coffee leaf disease detection with deep learning and enhanced multivariance product representation,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 10, p. e2406, 2024, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2406.

[15] R. T. Araaf, A. Minn, and T. Ahamed, “Coffee Leaf Rust Disease Detection and Implementation of an Edge Device for Pruning Infected Leaves via Deep Learning Algorithms,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 24, p. 8018, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24248018.

[16] R. A. Krohling, G. J. M. Esgario, and J. A. Ventura, “BRACOL - A Brazilian Arabica Coffee Leaf images dataset to identification and quantification of coffee diseases and pests,” vol. 1, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.17632/yy2k5y8mxg.1.

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

2026-07-06

Cách trích dẫn

TRAN HUU QUYET. (2026). COFFEE LEAF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION USING THREE LIGHTWEIGHT DEEP LEARNING MODELS: ROBUSTNESS EVALUATION AGAINST IMAGE DEGRADATION AND GRAD-CAM VISUALIZATION. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF TAN TRAO UNIVERSITY, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3706/2026/1478